Comments on: Vote for Research http://nextandmore.com/vote-for-research/ Moving The Edge Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:56:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Yuancheng http://nextandmore.com/vote-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-205 Yuancheng Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:18:28 +0000 http://nextandmore.com/?p=78#comment-205 Vote to 3. Research-in-design sounds interesting and of great challenge.. Vote to 3.
Research-in-design sounds interesting and of great challenge..

]]> By: Martin http://nextandmore.com/vote-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-202 Martin Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:10:19 +0000 http://nextandmore.com/?p=78#comment-202 Ok, more reflections - if anyone are still following... In a face-to-face conversation with Martin E, I think I stumble on an important idea: - what if I researched - through theory, process and experimental design - epistemic technologies. That means the technologies that would help us know, realize, discover stuff. In Danish we use "erkendelse" about that point where you realize something, have an insight, discover something, create a new idea or simple move from not-knowing to knowing. Is it possible to claim to be designing technologies that support this transition? Is it necessary to talk about computational technology - could it be process technologies instead? Is it necessary to focus only on collective, social technologies or are there obligatory individual technologies that also needs to be designed? Ok, more reflections – if anyone are still following…
In a face-to-face conversation with Martin E, I think I stumble on an important idea:
- what if I researched – through theory, process and experimental design – epistemic technologies. That means the technologies that would help us know, realize, discover stuff.
In Danish we use “erkendelse” about that point where you realize something, have an insight, discover something, create a new idea or simple move from not-knowing to knowing. Is it possible to claim to be designing technologies that support this transition? Is it necessary to talk about computational technology – could it be process technologies instead? Is it necessary to focus only on collective, social technologies or are there obligatory individual technologies that also needs to be designed?

]]> By: Martin http://nextandmore.com/vote-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-198 Martin Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:15:20 +0000 http://nextandmore.com/?p=78#comment-198 I am starting to dream of a possible future where several of these perspectives could be alive at the same time simply as lenses on the research activities I am involved in. I can tackle all these perspectives: - Social interaction: - Design thinking and the application of generative processes - Aesthetic interaction, interfaces and experiences - Bodily knowing, kinesthetic interaction and technologies for whole humans Carrying all these perspectives in a collected research effort means to apply various lenses on various aspects of the research process. In practical design work, when looking at the process, I can utilize and inform the design thinking perspective looking for generative thinking, creative work etc. and looking for the place where the designer explores from not-knowing and uses suspension techniques – inspired by C. Otto Scharmer and the break-through he is pioneering right now. When reporting on the actual designs created the lenses applied should look at bodily knowing, social interaction and aesthetic interactions. Research project ideas: - IPCIAG: Interfaces and Platforms for Collective Intelligence, Action and Growth - Holistic interfaces - Holonic interaction - Beyond the boundary of thought – techniques and technologies - Post-logic/individual interaction - PLoII Any thoughts, any resonance, anyone provoked? I am starting to dream of a possible future where several of these perspectives could be alive at the same time simply as lenses on the research activities I am involved in.

I can tackle all these perspectives:
- Social interaction:
- Design thinking and the application of generative processes
- Aesthetic interaction, interfaces and experiences
- Bodily knowing, kinesthetic interaction and technologies for whole humans

Carrying all these perspectives in a collected research effort means to apply various lenses on various aspects of the research process.
In practical design work, when looking at the process, I can utilize and inform the design thinking perspective looking for generative thinking, creative work etc. and looking for the place where the designer explores from not-knowing and uses suspension techniques – inspired by C. Otto Scharmer and the break-through he is pioneering right now.
When reporting on the actual designs created the lenses applied should look at bodily knowing, social interaction and aesthetic interactions.

Research project ideas:
- IPCIAG: Interfaces and Platforms for Collective Intelligence, Action and Growth
- Holistic interfaces
- Holonic interaction
- Beyond the boundary of thought – techniques and technologies
- Post-logic/individual interaction – PLoII

Any thoughts, any resonance, anyone provoked?

]]> By: Martin http://nextandmore.com/vote-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-193 Martin Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:57:29 +0000 http://nextandmore.com/?p=78#comment-193 Hey Martin E. Thanks for that comment. In my heart I have several strands that I would like to follow, and I would love to explore these with you in your coaching expertise. But right here at this page I would really like to invite discussion on the topics: What do you all see as the leading edge. Kim: Thanks for your thoughts. Yeah, I wasn't too satisfied with my second Reboot talk either. George is a very experienced man, and the presentation we did together at reboot9 definitely had hints of what it is I am searching for, but I am still searching for a way to combine the experience of collective intelligence, creativity and design... Hey Martin E.
Thanks for that comment. In my heart I have several strands that I would like to follow, and I would love to explore these with you in your coaching expertise. But right here at this page I would really like to invite discussion on the topics: What do you all see as the leading edge.

Kim: Thanks for your thoughts. Yeah, I wasn’t too satisfied with my second Reboot talk either. George is a very experienced man, and the presentation we did together at reboot9 definitely had hints of what it is I am searching for, but I am still searching for a way to combine the experience of collective intelligence, creativity and design…

]]> By: Martin Ehrensvärd http://nextandmore.com/vote-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-188 Martin Ehrensvärd Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:43:24 +0000 http://nextandmore.com/?p=78#comment-188 Dear Martin I would throw the question back at you and ask: What do you know deep in your heart that you must do? I would love to talk about this at the next meeting. In friendship Martin Dear Martin

I would throw the question back at you and ask: What do you know deep in your heart that you must do? I would love to talk about this at the next meeting.

In friendship
Martin

]]> By: Kim Bach http://nextandmore.com/vote-for-research/comment-page-1/#comment-186 Kim Bach Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:57:37 +0000 http://nextandmore.com/?p=78#comment-186 Wow that is great. I've been following you since reboot 9, the session you did there really rebooted me. Hearing about the more "pratical" things you've been doing at reboot 10 was also inspiring as well, but I was still a bit disappointed, so I, for one, is looking forward to you doing pure research again, and can't wait to see what you might be presenting at reboot 11-12 or 13. I think that your suggested topics grows in controversy and appeal (to me ;-)), my vote will be for 4, followed by 5 and 3. What I like about 4 and 5 is that it's going to move the focus away from technology.The strangest thing about our obsession on technology, is that humanity's current predicament has been caused by technology, and that we're still looking to technology to solve it. Wow that is great. I’ve been following you since reboot 9, the session you did there really rebooted me. Hearing about the more “pratical” things you’ve been doing at reboot 10 was also inspiring as well, but I was still a bit disappointed, so I, for one, is looking forward to you doing pure research again, and can’t wait to see what you might be presenting at reboot 11-12 or 13.

I think that your suggested topics grows in controversy and appeal (to me ;-)), my vote will be for 4, followed by 5 and 3.

What I like about 4 and 5 is that it’s going to move the focus away from technology.The strangest thing about our obsession on technology, is that humanity’s current predicament has been caused by technology, and that we’re still looking to technology to solve it.

]]>